Agricultural Markets in Colombia, Panama and S. Korea

1135
0

Agricultural interests in recent weeks have pressured Congress to move ahead with free trade agreements (FTA) with Colombia, Panama and South Korea that have been stalled for over three years. These markets vary in size, but they are all long-term markets where open access will be important in securing market share. These countries have offered to reduce import tariffs, but the U.S. has not agreed.

South Korea is clearly the biggest current market of the three for U.S. agriculture with exports of $4.38 billion in 2009 and imports of only $346 Mirioni, mostly seafood and consumer-oriented products. Coarse grains, mostly corn, accounted for 25 percent of U.S. exports at $1.11 Miria, followed by soybeans and products at $448 million and red meat at $437 Mirioni. U.S.. red meat exports grew from $157 million in 2005 as restrictions on beef imports from the U.S. have been eased. The other exports are spread out among virtually every product exported by U.S. ohipa faaapu. South Korea has a population of 48.5 Mirioni, the world’s 25th largest, and a per capita GDP on a purchasing power parity basis (PPP) of $28,000 per year, 49th highest in the world.

U.S.. agricultural exports to Colombia in 2009 were less than 25 percent of the exports to South Korean at $922 Mirioni. The U.S. has an agricultural trade deficit with Colombia because of coffee, nursery products (mainly cut flowers) and bananas and plantain imports of $1.53 billion out of total imports of $1.82 Miria. Colombia is now a bulk commodity market with coarse grains at $215 Mirioni, sitona $141 Mirioni, soybeans and products $141 Mirioni, cotton $66 million and other feeds $52 million accounting for two-thirds of U.S. exports. In times of ample world supplies open access to this market is critical because other suppliers in North and South America are readily available. Colombia’s population is almost as large as South Korea at 43.7 million with a per capita GDP of $9,200 per year.

The Panamanian market for U.S. agricultural products was about 40 percent of the Colombian market in 2009 i te $379 Mirioni, with imports from Panama of $118 Mirioni, mostly seafood and consumer-oriented products. Like Colombia, most exports to Panama are bulk commodities with coarse grains at $69 Mirioni, soybean oil and meal $54 Mirioni, sitona $30 million and rice $17 Mirioni. Snack foods are the largest consumer-oriented category at $26 Mirioni. Panama’s population is only 3.4 Mirioni, the 134st largest country, and per capita GDP is $11,900 per year.

The South Korean agricultural market is a textbook case of market development where the market began as a bulk commodity market to supplement domestic production. Over time as per capita GDP grew, the bulk market grew and demand increased for intermediate and consumer oriented products. Colombia and Panama are working through the bulk commodity phase of development with the shift beginning toward intermediate and consumer oriented products. Full access to the intermediate and consumer-oriented product markets cannot be achieved without the three countries shaking off their protectionist policies with FTAs.

Under the U.S.-Korea FTA, tariffs on corn, sitona, soybeans for crushing and hides and skins would be zero, simply recognizing the reality that Korean consumers cannot prosper without these products. Rice remains a politically sensitive import and tariffs would not be change from WTO mandated levels. Consumer-oriented products accounted for 29 percent of U.S. exports to Korea in 2009 and are expected to grow rapidly under the FTA. Tariffs for out-of-season oranges would be reduced to 30 percent and eliminated over six years and the 54 percent tariff on frozen orange juice dropped immediately. Te 30 percent tariff for lemons and grapefruit would be eliminated over two years and five years. Other fruits and vegetables would have a mixture of immediate elimination of tariffs and phase outs of up to 18 mau matahiti. Frozen and fresh pork product tariffs would be reduced to zero by 2014. Te 40 percent tariff on beef muscle meat would be reduced to zero over 15 mau matahiti. Poultry meat, eggs and dairy would have similar reductions in tariffs with tariff rate quotas (TRQs).

Colombia’s economy is not as developed and more transition time is needed for many products. Tariffs would be eliminated on wheat, nonfeed barley, Te mau nota, soybean meal, high quality beef, most fruit and vegetable products, peanuts, whey, cotton and the majority of processed products. Duty-free TRQs would be created for standard beef, chicken leg quarters, dairy products, Te mau mana'o tauturu no te, sorghum, animal feeds, rice, and soybean oil. Over-quota tariffs for standard beef would be eliminated over 15 mau matahiti, chicken leg quarters over 18 mau matahiti, dairy products over 15 mau matahiti, pork over 5 e 10 mau matahiti, Te mau mana'o tauturu no te, sorghum and animal feeds over 12 mau matahiti, soybean oil over 5 e 10 years and rice over 19 mau matahiti.

Panama is similar to Colombia with tariffs on 63 percent of U.S. agricultural trade eliminated immediately with most other tariffs declining over 15 mau matahiti. Wheat, barley, Te mau nota, soybean meal and crude soybean oil would be duty free immediately. High quality beef tariffs would be immediately reduced to zero, while standard quality beef tariffs would take 15 mau matahiti. For products with longer tariff phase outs, duty-free market access would be provided through TRQs. Corn and rice would have TRQs phased out over 15 e 20 mau matahiti. Pork over quota tariffs would be phased out over 15 mau matahiti. Tariffs on some poultry products would be eliminated immediately and othersover quota tariffs phased out over 18 mau matahiti. Dairy products have similar provisions. For fruits and vegetables, 80 percent of tariffs would be immediately eliminated and others reduced over 5 to 12 mau matahiti.

These countries have made a real paradigm shift in recognizing markets must be more open to provide benefits to consumers. They all have individual political needs to protect some products and provide long transitions for others. The Obama Administration and the U.S. Congress appear to have not caught on to that paradigm shift. These three countries have not remained static while the U.S. waits. If they cannot access food from the U.S., it will be done with other countries. South Korea signed a FTA with the EU and is working on one with Canada. Panama and Colombia have signed separate agreements with Canada.

Ross Korves
PAPA'IHIA E

Ross Korves

Ross Korves served Truth about Trade & Aravihi, before it became Global Farmer Network, from 2004 2015 as the Economic and Trade Policy Analyst.

Researching and analyzing economic issues important to agricultural producers, Ross provided an intimate understanding regarding the interface of economic policy analysis and the political process.

Ua parau mai o. Korves served the American Farm Bureau Federation as an Economist from 1980-2004. He served as Chief Economist from April 2001 through September 2003 and held the title of Senior Economist from September 2003 through August 2004.

Born and raised on a southern Illinois hog farm and educated at Southern Illinois University, Ross holds a Masters Degree in Agribusiness Economics. His studies and research expanded internationally through his work in Germany as a 1984 McCloy Agricultural Fellow and study travel to Japan in 1982, Zambia and Kenya in 1985 and Germany in 1987.

Vaiiho i te hoe pahonoraa