The House and Senate legislation have almost identical provisions. The House bill says, “…all of the iron and steel used in the project is produced in the United States.” The Senate language includes “and the relevant manufactured goods” after the word “steel.” Exceptions are provided if the government agency finds it “would be inconsistent with the public interest; iron and steel are not produced in the U.S. in sufficient and reasonably available quantities and of a satisfactory quality; or inclusion of iron and steel produced in the United States will increase the cost of the overall project by more than 25 प्रतिशत।” Note the entire project must cost 25 percent more, not the iron or steel in it. If the requirement is waived, the department or agency must publish in the Federal Register a detailed justification.
According to an analysis titled “Buy American: Bad for Jobs and Worse for Reputation” by Gary Hufbauer and Jeffery Schott of the Peterson Institute for International Economics, the steel industry could possibly gain 1,000 jobs from the House provisions while the broader Senate language could result in an additional 9,000 manufacturing job. The total U.S. labor force is about 140 दस लाख. अमेरिका. steel manufacturing is capital intensive with 150,000 workers producing 100 मिलियन मेट्रिक टन (एमएमटी) per year prior to the current economic slowdown. The authors estimate the House stimulus plans will need about 0.5 MMT tons of steel. The Senate jobs impact is based on Administration estimates that the stimulus plan will created 220,000 jobs in manufacturing and an Office of Federal Procurement Policy estimate that 4 percent of federal spending on manufactured goods is for imported products.
Trading partners have already talked about retaliation. अमेरिका. steel industry exported about 9 MMT of steel in 2007 लेखा के लिए 14,000 नौकरियां. ए 6-7 percent cutback in steel exports due to trade policy changes would wipe out the extra steel employment from the buy American legislation. Hufbauer and Schott estimate that 12 major U.S. trading partners import about $104 billion per year in U.S. goods and services for government use. If only one percent of those purchases were eliminated by trade policy retaliation, that would result in the loss of 6,500 अमेरिका. नौकरियां. If two percent of the purchases were lost, उन 13,000 lost jobs would exceed the potential 10,000 job gain. Of course the lost jobs would be spread through dozens of manufacturing industries and not seen like the concentrated jobs in steel.
The economic outcomes could be much worse. अमेरिका. steel companies will charge higher prices for their steel because of less competition for stimulus related projects and other government work. Fewer roads and schools would be built and less other workers employed. Higher steel prices would bleed into non-government work and those products would be less competitive in world markets. Steel producers in other countries may lower steel prices and provide more competition against the U.S. in third country markets.
The Senate language is a major problem for the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement (gpa) and the procurement chapter of NAFTA. अमेरिका. has spent years negotiating changes in restrictive purchasing practices of other governments which could be undone by the Senate. The GPA includes the 27 यूरोपीय संघ के देशों और 12 others including the U.S. Hufbauer and Schott state, “In the absence of a reservation or exemption, the application of Buy American provisions to projects sponsored by entities covered in the GPA would violate U.S. obligations.” अध्याय 10 of NAFTA on government procurement applies to the federal government, but not to states. The authors believe that the stimulus spending is covered because the federal government is providing funding for specific programs.
Hufbauer and Schott believe the biggest impact will be on U.S. विदेश नीति, “In a stroke, the United States would forfeit the moral high ground when it comes to slowing the protectionist juggernaut that now threatens the world economy.” They offer three options for dealing with the issue. The best is to delete the buy American provisions; that was rejected by the Senate. The next best is to keep the less restrictive House language, but state in the bill that the “public interest wavier” will be used to avoid violation of trade obligations. The third option is a statement from President Obama that the U.S. will honor its international obligations. The Senate kept the more restrictive language and added words on honoring obligations.
All of this activity is a huge waste of time. Legislating an increase in the cost of doing business is not the road to economic recovery. अमेरिका. taxpayers and workers will be the biggest losers as they get less construction and repairs than they were promised and fewer workers are employed on projects. Jobs for lawyers will increase as they sue in the U.S. over what the law requires and lawyers from other countries file cases against the U.S. under WTO and NAFTA. That is a dead weight loss that the U.S. does not need.
और, worse legislation is waiting in the wings. Some members of Congress support a requirement that the $20 billion for computerizing medical records go only to American tech firms. That may be impossible to do with the global nature of the information technology business. At some point it may become obvious that trying to protect a segment of the U.S. economy at the expense of the general population never was a good idea and is even worse now.