The worldwide credit crisis is having a direct impact on the availability of credit to finance the annual $14 trillion of international trade. Traders are turning to government programs to fill the gap. When the USDA Foreign Agricultural Service announced in early October the availability of $3.5 billion in Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) export credit guarantees, within 48 hours it received over $8 billion of applications. Pressures for more government programs will likely continue to increase in the months ahead.

In recent years CCC export credit guarantees have had a declining influence on U.S. exportacions. For fiscal years (l'any fiscal) 2000-2004 allocations for the GSM-102 program were about $4.5 billion per year and applications were about $3.0 billion per year. By FY2007 allocations had declined to $3.7 billion while approved applications declined to $1.4 mIL mILIONS. For FY2008 credit allocations were $3.3 billion and applications approved were $3.1 mIL mILIONS. Over those eight years U.S. agricultural exports more than doubled from $50.8 billion in FY2000 to $115.5 billion in FY2008. The current USDA forecast for FY2009 made in November shows export value declining to $98.5 mIL mILIONS.

For FY2009 USDA has a maximum of $5.5 billion of credit guarantees to allocate as mandated in the 2008 farm bill and chose to front load the allocations at the start of the new fiscal year. In mid-December 18 agricultural groups requested the House and Senate Agriculture Committees consider waiving or eliminating the cap as part of an “economic stimuluspackage that is expected to pass in early 2009.

The credit guarantee program is targeted to middle income developing countries. The least developed countries general cannot afford to pay for food imports and depend on PL480 and the Food for Peace Program donations. Developed countries like Japan and the EU can pay cash or use commercial credits programs without government guarantees. Countries that qualified for the early October allocations included South Korea for $600 milió, Southeast Asian region countries for $500 milió, Russia for $400 milió, Turkey for $400 milió, South American region countries for $400 milió, Central American region countries for $350 milió, Eurasia region countries for $300 milió, Caribbean region countries for $200 milió, Africa and the Middle East region countries for 100 milió, China for $100 million and Mexico for $100 milió.

All of the allocations in October were for credit of up to 36 months. Credit is usually extended in dollars by a U.S. bank to an approved foreign bank with irrevocable letters of credit. Ninety eight percent of the principal and a portion of interest are typically covered by the guarantee which allows a U.S. bank to offer competitive credit terms based on the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (LIBOR). After a firm sale is made the U.S. exporter applies for a payment guarantee before the export date and pays a fee based on the country risk of the buying country. The fee structure is based on rulings by the WTO that export credit programs must be risk based and fees cover long-term program operating costs and losses.

These types of government credit programs are part of the ongoing Doha Round of WTO trade policy talks because of the potential for terms that can be viewed as export subsidies. The argument has been that developed countries can afford to finance cheap credit while developing country competitors have no choice but to sell at lower market prices to offset the low-cost credit.

The WTO is well aware of the problems of tight credit for trade financing. WTO Director-General Pascal Lamy had a meeting with financial experts in April and a follow-up meeting in mid-November. In a speech to an informal meeting of heads of WTO delegations immediately after the November meeting Lamy noted that during the Asian financial crisis of the late 1990s and other smaller credit crises the WTO worked with the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and other groups to aid developing countries hardest hit by credit problems. He estimated the liquidity gap in trade finance in mid-November at $25 billion and believed the gap could be managed by the World Bank, the IMF, private banks and other institutions working together to manage risk.

The coordinated effort Lamy talked about has taken shape. Els EUA. Federal Reserve established a $600 billion swap fund with other countries to make dollars available to central banks. Brasil, Mèxic, South Korea and Singapore have $30 billion swap lines with the Federal Reserve. The World Bank has made $3 billion in trade credit available. Els EUA. Export-Import Bank has a $2.9 billion credit guarantee program with South Korea. Once banks recognize that many trade finance loans are solid and provide higher returns than other lending, some are likely to reenter the market.

The reemergence of government lending for private trade activities is a troubling development for trade policy, but doing nothing is not an option. Developing countries need to continue to import food and exporters have ample supplies. Once the U.S. Federal Reserve and other central banks massively intervened to protect some borrowers and lenders, the credit markets were reshaped in favor of borrowers with implicit or explicit government guarantees. Lending for trade finance for developing countries became more risky relative to government protected markets.

The WTO should be involved in the policy discussions to contain the damage to current trade flows and prevent the proliferation of implicit export subsidies. Now is the time to find ways to unwind the government control of credit before it becomes institutionalized and much harder to undo.